A revealing report from Declassified UK exposes growing discontent within Reuters, as several staff—speaking anonymously—accuse the agency’s editors and management of applying a pro-Israel bias in their coverage of Palestine, especially during the Israel–Hamas war.
A key flashpoint was the agency’s reporting on the assassination of Palestinian journalist Anas al-Sharif—a former Reuters staffer and Pulitzer co-winner—headline-framed as “Israel kills Al Jazeera journalist it says was Hamas leader,” prompting strong internal pushback.
Specific concerns include:
- Instances where reporting blurred into potentially sanitized or one-sided framing.
- A desk editor resigned in August 2024 after realizing their values no longer aligned with management, citing stifling of critical perspectives.
New Findings Highlighted
The report further reveals:
- A confidential 26-page internal study forming the basis of staff criticisms.
- A May 27 internal email updating the Middle East style sheet, permitting use of “genocide” with attribution.
- An open letter signed by multiple Reuters staff, highlighting editorial concerns and sent to management.
- Six documented instances of pro-Israel bias identified within Reuters’ reporting handbook.
- Evidence confirming the resignation of a desk editor six months after the open letter was sent in 2023.
- A systematic review of 300 Reuters reports since the style update—fewer than 5% (14/300) used the term “genocide” despite the allowance.
- Exclusive interviews and quotes from Dr. Assal Rad, Dr. Raz Segal, and a current Reuters employee.
Why It Matters for Dearborn
Dearborn’s diverse community includes many who rely on trusted media for fair coverage of the Israel–Palestine conflict. Allegations from within Reuters—one of the world’s most influential news agencies—raise serious questions about how international events are framed and consumed locally.
Dearborn Blog 