Excerpt:
America’s electoral system is under siege—not by invasion or revolution—but by erosion from within. With gerrymandering, voter suppression, and legislative experiments in restricting ballot access, democracy in many states is becoming a facade. For Greens concerned with true participatory power, the collapse of democratic voting could mean more than broken promises—it could mean disappearing hope.
When Democracy Ends Up Looking Autocratic
It’s tempting to think robust democracies are immune to decay. Reality suggests otherwise. Across several U.S. states, what might appear superficially as competitive elections are increasingly engineered outcomes favoring entrenched power. As Scott Tucker’s warning echoes—both major parties contribute to this collapse, squeezing out Greens, independents, and those who challenge the corporate duopoly.
Rigged Maps, Diluted Votes
- Recent analyses show gerrymandering giving one party a structural advantage of around 16 U.S. House seats in the 2024 cycle alone.¹
- Courts have repeatedly found maps in states like Wisconsin, North Carolina, Texas, Ohio and Florida crafted so that one party holds veto-proof or near‐absolute legislative control, regardless of how people vote.
In these states, even when Democratic candidates win the popular vote statewide—for governor, attorney general, or U.S. Senate—they still may lose control of the legislature. Votes are cracked (split among districts so no group gets enough power) or packed (concentrated so excess votes go “wasted”).²
Laws That Close Doors, Not Open Them
- Voter ID laws: As of April 2025, 36 states require voters to present some form of ID at the polls; 23 require photo ID specifically.³
- Purges of voter rolls: States are increasing how aggressively they remove people from rolls, often citing non-voting, address changes, or other technicalities. These purges disproportionately affect Black, Latino, young, poor, and formerly incarcerated voters.
- Legislation like the SAVE Act (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act), passed by the House in 2025, would require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship (such as passports or birth certificates) to register for federal elections—measures which critics argue will disenfranchise many eligible Americans without lowering fraud (which remains rare).⁴
Asymmetry in Power and Public Perception
- A Reuters/Ipsos poll in August 2025 found 57% of Americans believe democracy is in danger, and 55% oppose partisan redistricting.⁵
- Gerrymandering isn’t just political cynicism; it hurts communities. Where district lines are manipulated, confidence in elections drops sharply, especially among marginalized groups.⁶
Five States Where Elections Are Becoming Engineered
Though the term “autocratic democracy” is provocative, five states often spotlighted for systemic decay in democratic competition are:
Wisconsin, North Carolina, Texas, Ohio, and Florida. In all these, maps are drawn, laws passed, or courts controlled to make outcomes predictable for one party. Even if voters try to revolt at the ballot box, the structures rarely let that revolt alter legislative control.⁷
The Green Party’s Stakes in This Collapse
For the Green Party, these are not theoretical issues—they are existential threats:
- Ballot Access Suppression
The mechanisms that favor Democrats vs Republicans also easily silence smaller parties: signature requirements, deadlines, legal barriers. Greens are often bumped off ballots because these rules are structured for the duopoly. Scott Tucker’s remark that “the Democratic Party is also anti-democratic, and their mobsters also bump Greens and independent socialists off ballots” rings true when both major parties agree on rules that exclude challengers. - Vote Dilution & Disenfranchisement
Even when Green or independent voters show up, their voices are overwhelmed in systems designed to “waste” votes—either by packing or cracking, or by requiring excessive proof to vote, or purging voter rolls. - Perpetuation of Corporate Money Dominance
When elections are engineered, major donors, corporations, and entrenched elites can further reinforce their power—because challenging the status quo becomes legally, financially, and administratively harder.
Can It Be Reversed? Where Hope Still Flickers
Yes: it’s not too late. The collapse isn’t inevitable, though without aggressive reform, it may become irreversible. Greens should explore, push, and support:
- State Voting Rights Acts (SVRAs): New laws in states like New York (John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act) prohibit vote dilution and require jurisdictional pre-approval of election changes.⁸
- Restoring or Updating the Voting Rights Act: Federal preclearance (where jurisdictions with histories of violations must get approval before changing election rules) needs revival.
- Fair Redistricting Reform: Independent commissions, transparent mapping tools, anti-gerrymandering legal standards.
- Resisting Suppressive Legislation: Laws like the SAVE Act need both resistance in the legislature and legal challenges when passed.
A Moment That Defines Us
“When millions are purged from voter rolls while districts are surgically rigged … the system hasn’t tilted, it’s collapsed.”
We face precisely that kind of moment. For Greens, this is more than politics—it’s about democracy itself. If the playing field is broken, then voting isn’t really voting. We must insist not merely on access, but on fairness.
The Collapse Isn’t Just Rhetoric—it’s Systemic
| Indicator | What the Data Shows |
|---|---|
| House Seat Bias | Gerrymandering is estimated to hand Republicans ~16 extra seats in 2024 than a fair map would.¹ |
| Number of States with Voter ID Laws | 36 states require some form of identification at polls; 23 require photo ID.³ |
| Public Concern | Over half of Americans believe democracy is “in danger.”⁵ |
What Greens Can Do in Dearborn—and Nationally
In a place like Dearborn, where community voices often get drowned by state or national power, the stakes are no less high. Small things matter: registering to vote, showing up at local hearings about district maps, pushing for transparent election administration, supporting candidates who prioritize structural reform (not just sound policy).
Nationally, supporting organizations that bring litigation, that monitor elections, that build public awareness—and making sure our own party is never complicit in the same exclusionary practices.
Conclusion
Democracy isn’t only about ballots—it’s about fairness, equality, transparency. When maps are rigged, access restricted, or the rules biased, voting becomes a ritual without power. For Greens, the collapse of democratic voting is not an abstract concern—it’s the collapse of possibility.
We’re at a crossroads: continue letting two corporate-money parties control the rules, or break open space for real democracy. Dearborn Blogs stands with the latter.
Sources
- Brennan Center for Justice, “How Gerrymandering Tilts the 2024 Race for the House” (Sep. 24, 2024). Brennan Center for Justice
- Voting Rights Lab, Election Policy Tracker; also analyses from Princeton and Michigan Partisan Advantage Tracker. tracker.votingrightslab.org+2ippsr.msu.edu+2
- National Conference of State Legislatures, Voter ID laws (April 2025 report). NCSL
- Information on the SAVE Act, its passage in the U.S. House, and opposition arguments, from political reporting and Brennan Center summaries. The Guardian+2Wikipedia+2
- Reuters/Ipsos poll, August 2025, on public opinion regarding democracy and partisan redistricting. Reuters
- University of California, Riverside, survey on gerrymandering & voter confidence. UCR News
- Multiple state cases (Wisconsin, North Carolina, Texas, Ohio, Florida) as documented in recent analyses of maps, voter suppression laws, and court rulings. See Brennan Center, Voting Rights Lab, redistricting report cards. Brennan Center for Justice+2tracker.votingrightslab.org+2
- John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York and broader State Voting Rights Acts as mechanisms for countering suppression and dilution. Wikipedia+1
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes. Dearborn Blog does not provide legal advice. Interpretations of legislation or court rulings are those of the author. For legal matters, consult a qualified professional.

