Robert Rules of Order should be the governing rules for all governing bodies in governments and their institutions, as well as non-governmental institutions.
Article 7 – Rules of Order
Democratic governance quickly decays into confusion and domination by the loudest voices when there are no shared rules for how we meet, debate, and decide. In any city in the world, public institutions—such as city councils, school boards, public committees, and community councils—should conduct their work under a clear, consistent, and fair system of parliamentary procedure. Robert’s Rules of Order offers such a framework: a well-tested method that structures meetings, clarifies motions, regulates debate, and ensures that both majority and minority viewpoints are heard. When public bodies adopt Robert’s Rules, they reduce arbitrariness, prevent abuse of power by whoever holds the chair, and make decisions through a transparent, step-by-step process that the public can follow and trust.
Alongside formal parliamentary procedure, many communities are inspired by alternative decision-making methodologies such as consensus, sociocracy, and “dynamic governance.” These approaches focus on the style and spirit of decision-making—seeking deeper agreement, inclusion, and shared ownership of outcomes. However, they are not, by themselves, complete mechanics for running meetings: they typically do not specify how to introduce motions, recognize speakers, handle amendments, resolve procedural disputes, or record decisions in a consistent way. For this reason, they are best understood as decision styles that can be integrated into a robust procedural framework. Robert’s Rules of Order can serve as the backbone for meeting mechanics, while a city, organization, or assembly explicitly adopts consensus-seeking or sociocratic principles to guide how options are developed, how concerns are addressed, and how strongly the group aims for agreement before resorting to a vote.
The purpose of adopting Rules of Order is not empty formality; it is the protection of people and the integrity of decisions. Robert’s Rules safeguard the right of members to speak, propose, amend, and object; they protect minority voices from being steamrolled, and they protect the validity of votes by ensuring that every decision is properly introduced, debated, and recorded. When all public bodies in a city follow the same procedural standard, residents can understand how decisions are made, trace how an issue moved from proposal to vote, and hold their institutions accountable. A city that combines clear parliamentary mechanics with humane, consensus-oriented decision styles affirms a simple principle: power must be exercised openly, fairly, and according to rules that apply equally to all, while always striving for the broadest possible agreement among its people.
Dearborn Blog 